Sustainability Reporting Has Arrived – What Yesterday’s Briefing Means for Australian Organisations
- Cat Squire

- Nov 13, 2025
- 3 min read
Yesterday’s national sustainability briefing, hosted by the Governance Institute of Australia in partnership with William Buck, reinforced a simple truth: sustainability reporting is no longer an emerging concept. It is a live regulatory requirement that will reshape how Australian organisations plan, govern, disclose, and operate for decades to come.

The session unpacked the new climate-related financial disclosure standards under AASB S2, supported by ASIC’s Regulatory Guide 280, and clarified how these changes will be embedded into the Corporations Act, forming a permanent part of Australia’s financial reporting landscape.
The message was clear: climate reporting is not a side project. It is mainstream governance.
The new reporting foundation
AASB S1 introduces voluntary sustainability-related disclosures, but AASB S2 is the real turning point, mandating climate-related financial reporting across:
Governance
Strategy
Risk management
Metrics and targets
This means Boards and executives must understand where their organisation is materially exposed to climate-related risks, including physical hazards, transition impacts, regulatory change, and market expectations.
Importantly, sustainability reporting is not the sole responsibility of Finance; a point emphasised by Rainer Ahrens of William Buck. Just because climate disclosures contain numbers does not mean they belong to a single department. These reforms represent a whole-of-business shift in governance maturity.
Risk, regulators, and the cost of getting it wrong
The briefing highlighted the increasing regulatory appetite for enforcement, underscored by the Federal Government’s $83.7m commitment to support sustainability oversight. ASIC has already signalled that climate-related disclosure will be a compliance priority, and greenwashing enforcement is accelerating.
Directors will be expected to justify their position on climate exposure—even when making the case that an organisation is not materially impacted. A policy drafted hastily before a Board meeting will not survive scrutiny.
Scenario analysis; particularly around changing hazard frequency, increased severity of events, worker health, supply chain disruption, and coastal vulnerability—must become a standard tool, not an optional exercise using outdated historical weather patterns.
Industry insights
The panel offered valuable practitioner perspectives:
Mark Smit, William Buck – provided a grounded view of the practical challenges in implementing the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards.
Rainer Ahrens, William Buck – emphasised that long-term relationships and genuine understanding of business operations are essential. Compliance alone does not build resilience.
Ben Kirkwood, ESG Lead at Pallion – demonstrated how early adoption of emissions tracking has delivered commercial value, including improved accreditation ratings and access to sustainability-driven customer markets.
Ben’s remarks also emphasised governance integration: sustainability reporting must sit alongside finance reporting, not behind it. Boards should expect to see sustainability analysis as a standing agenda item.
What this means for businesses (including SMEs and NFPs)
Mandatory reporting obligations will apply in phases, and not-for-profits limited by guarantee will still face requirements; a point relevant to many industry bodies and membership organisations (including examples like AIQS and ACAPMA). Only ACNC-registered charities remain exempt.
Even smaller entities outside mandatory thresholds will face increased due-diligence expectations from insurers, financiers, government procurement panels, and supply chains.
The competitive landscape will favour organisations that can clearly demonstrate climate maturity.
How Light Years Agency is responding
At Light Years Agency, we are integrating sustainability governance into our own operating model— including practical measures for small businesses such as work-from-home solar allowance options, emissions awareness, and future ESG reporting capability.
Our approach for clients is grounded in readiness, governance clarity, and practical implementation—not premature software spend.
Final reflections
Yesterday’s briefing made one thing unmistakable: climate reporting is here, it is enforceable, and it is reshaping governance expectations in Australia. Organisations that treat this as a compliance task will fall behind. Those that embed sustainability into strategy, risk, culture, and Board practice will find competitive advantage.
Thank you to William Buck and the Governance Institute of Australia for hosting an insightful and well-structured session that will no doubt influence the next phase of organisational governance across the country.




Comments